| Candidate | Party | Win % |
|---|---|---|
Randy Feenstra INCUMBENT | >99% | |
Ryan Melton | <1% |
Chance of winning Iowa 4 over time
Our model is updated every day, blending the latest data on polls and fundraising with "fundamental" factors like incumbency and each district's partisan lean. Below is a chart over time of our best estimate of the most likely number of House seats each party will win, surrounded by a range of other plausible outcomes.
About Iowa 4
Cook PVI
D+18.8
Last Winner
Republican
Campaign Finance
An overview of each candidate's financial activity during the campaign, showing how much money they raised and spent. Campaign finance data can be a powerful indicator of a candidate's support base and overall campaign health.
| Candidate | Cash on hand | Raised | Spent | Report | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Randy Feenstra | $1,088,896 | $1,678,249 | $3,250,175 | May 15, 2024 | |
Ryan Melton | $20,481 | $44,487 | $30,896 | May 15, 2024 |
Candidate
Cash on hand
$1,088,896
Raised
$1,678,249
Spent
$3,250,175
Report
Date
May 15, 2024
Candidate
Cash on hand
$20,481
Raised
$44,487
Spent
$30,896
Report
Date
May 15, 2024
Past Elections
This section displays the previous election results in previous elections for Iowa 4. By examining past election results, we can assess the historical performance and voter preferences in the district. This information is crucial for understanding trends and potential shifts in voter support.
| 2022 Iowa House 04 | Vote % | Total Votes |
|---|---|---|
Randy Feenstra | 67.38% | 186,467 |
Ryan Melton | 30.44% | 84,230 |
Bryan Jack Holder | 2.18% | 6,035 |
2022 Iowa House 04
Randy Feenstra
Vote %
67.38%
Total Votes
186,467
2022 Iowa House 04
Ryan Melton
Vote %
30.44%
Total Votes
84,230
2022 Iowa House 04
Bryan Jack Holder
Vote %
2.18%
Total Votes
6,035
+ More Elections
Featured Races
Explore the latest probabilities in the most competitive presidential, Senate, and House races by selecting any of the races listed below.
Interested to see how the DDHQ/The Hill forecast works? Read our methodology statement.
